To access or download, please click here.
The article explores the evolution of competing approaches to the religious law of Muslim minorities (fiqh al-aqalliyyāt al-muslima): the wasaṭī and the salafī. Both approaches are grounded in a similar triumphalist and revivalist contextualization of Muslim presence in the West. The wasaṭī approach, led by al-Azhar graduates and Islamist activists, presents two objectives: making the lives of Muslim minorities easier in order to preserve their Islamic identity, and endorsing efforts to Islamize the West. To promote these objectives wasaṭīs emphasize a systematic search in all four religiolegal schools and beyond them and the liberal application of maṣlaḥa (public or individual interest). Some of the results achieved by this methodology demonstrate the potential of maṣlaḥa to revise any religious law relating to muʿāmalāt (social transactions). The stricter salafī approach associated with conservative elements in Saudi Arabia’s religious establishment emphasizes the concept of al-walā’ wa’l-barā’ (loyalty and disavowal). Its juristic interpretations are based on opposition to perceived innovations, imitation of infidels and cooperation with them. I examine the two approaches through a systematic analysis of three issues that are central to the religious law of Muslim minorities: non-Muslim holidays, mortgages and service in non-Muslim militaries.